检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王璐 WANG Lu(Anshan Central Hospital,Liaoning Anshan 114000)
出 处:《中国医疗器械信息》2021年第3期138-139,共2页China Medical Device Information
摘 要:目的:探究两种方法联合检测在梅毒感染诊断中的临床价值。方法:选择2019年5月~2019年9月本院收治的158例疑似梅毒感染患者,将其分别进行TP-ELISA检查、TRUST检查、对比单一检查结果与联合检查结果的差异。结果:联合检查组灵敏度、特异度均高于TP-ELISA组和TRUST组,P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。联合检查组的假阴性率、假阳性率均低于TP-ELISA组和TRUST组,P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论:两种方法联合检检测在梅毒感染中的诊断效果显著,可以有效对患者进行诊断减少误诊漏诊率。Objective:To explore the clinical value of combined detection of two methods in the diagnosis of syphilis infection.Methods:158 suspected syphilis patients from May 2019 to September 2019 in our hospital were selected and tested by TP-ELISA,TRUST,and the differences between single test results and joint test results were compared.Results:The sensitivity and specificity of the combined test group were higher than those of TP-ELISA group and TRUST group(P<0.05).The false negative rate and false positive rate of the combined examination group were lower than those of the TP-ELISA group and TRUST group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The combined detection of the two methods has a significant effect in the diagnosis of syphilis infection.It can effectively reduce the probability of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis for patients.
关 键 词:TP-ELISA检查 TRUST TPPA 梅毒感染 诊断价值
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.226.159.125