非法持有宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义物品罪的规范限缩  

Limitations on the Crime of Illegal Possession of Items Propagating Terrorism and Extremism

作　　者：兰皓翔 王今朝 原伟民 LAN Hao-xiang;WANG Jin-zhao;YUAN Wei-min(不详)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《四川警察学院学报》2021年第1期10-17,共8页Journal of Sichuan Police College

基　　金：中南财经政法大学研究生创新课题项目“非法持有宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义物品罪的限缩适用”(201910721)。

摘　　要：持有行为入罪的正当性原理是行为对法益的抽象性危险。《刑法修正案(九)》设立的"宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义物品罪"不满足持有型犯罪的基本特征:"持有行为与实害结果的密接性",存在对法益保护原则稀释。究其原因,在于宏大反恐背景下对于安全价值的过度倾斜。罪状中规范性构成要件要素含义不明确以及本罪的"恐怖主义活动"属性,导致了实然上规制范围的非理性扩张和制裁程度的加重。基于法教义学的叙事逻辑,在我国现实的刑事立法下,理应对本罪的处罚边界进行规范性限缩,具体路径包括:构成要件要素的规范解释、"正当目的"的出罪机制以及"最后适用性"的潜在限制。The legitimacy principle of convicting holding behavior is the abstract danger of behavior to legal benefits.The crime of illegal possession of items propagating terrorism and extremism in the Amendment to the Criminal Law(9)does not satisfy the basic characteristic of possessing crimes,that is,the closeness of possession and the harmful results,which means a dilution of the legal protection principle. The reason lies in the excessive tilt on security value in the context of grand anti-terrorism. The unclear meaning of the normative elements of the guilt and the terrorist activity attribute of the crime have led to the irrational expansion of regulation scope and the increase in sanctions. Therefore,based on the narrative logic of legal doctrine,under the actual criminal legislation in China,the punishment boundary of this crime should be standardized and narrowed down involving the standard interpretation of the essential elements,the legitimate purpose crime mechanism,and the potential limitations of final applicability.

关 键 词：持有犯 非法持有宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义物品罪 规范限缩 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]