检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏琼[1] 徐俊晖 WEI Qiong;XU Jun-hui(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出 处:《时代法学》2021年第1期12-22,共11页Presentday Law Science
基 金:2020年度国家社会科学基金重大委托项目“中华法系与中华法律文化问题研究”(批准号:20@ZH019)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:我国《行政处罚法》实施二十多年后,人工智能的应用为行政处罚执法开辟了新路径,对提升国家治理能力现代化具有重大意义。在实践中,人工智能与行政处罚执法之间存在着极高的可交互性,人工智能可被广泛地应用于行政处罚执法各个阶段之中,发挥着积极意义,助推《行政处罚法》的有效实施。为了确保人工智能在行政处罚中合法合理地应用,有必要对人工智能进行法律规制,诸如合理定位人工智能、坚持正当程序约束、全面监管人工智能,以期加快智慧处罚进程,最终实现人工智能时代的“良法善治”。More than 20 years after the implementation of the administrative punishment law,the application of artificial intelligence has opened a new path for the enforcement of administrative punishment,which is of great significance to the modernization of national governance capacity.In the practice of the administrative enforcement,there is high interactivity between artificial intelligence and administrative punishment,artificial intelligence is widely used in various stages of administrative punishment enforcement,playing a positive role and promoting the effective implementation of administrative punishment law.In order to ensure that artificial intelligence can be used in administrative punishment legally and reasonably,it is necessary to carry out legal regulations on artificial intelligence,such as reasonably positioning artificial intelligence,adhering to due process constraints,and comprehensively supervising artificial intelligence,so as to speed up the process of intelligent punishment,and finally realize the“good law and good governance”in the era of artificial intelligence.
分 类 号:DF31[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249