防卫过当界限司法判定的三个维度分析  

Three Dimensions of Judicial Determination of the Limit of Excessive Self-defense

作　　者：李建超 孙琳 杨常雨 LI Jian-chao;SUN Lin;YANG Chang-yu(The People's Procuratorate of Chongqing Municipality,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]重庆市人民检察院,重庆401120 [2]重庆市人民检察院检察一部,重庆401120

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2020年第6期63-68,共6页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

摘　　要：防卫行为限度如何把握的问题在理论界与实务界一直争论不休。近日“两高一部”联合颁布的《关于依法适用正当防卫制度的指导意见》回应了该问题,尤其进一步明确了防卫过当的认定条件,具有重要意义。然而,法律语言本身的模糊性在一定程度上降低了指导意见对防卫过当司法认定的可操作性。防卫行为限度的判定本身具有主观性,决定了其界限的模糊性与不易量化性,映射到司法实务会导致司法裁判的不稳定性。为有利于指导司法裁判,以法律实用主义视角,通过结合石某某故意伤害案,对防卫行为限度的“意”“形”“神”三个维度,即防卫意识、限度标准与正当性根据的分析,探寻判定正当防卫界限的有效方法与路径。It has been continuously argued to determine the limit of self-defense.The Guidance of Legal Application of Self-defense System makes the response.But the vagueness of legal language in a certain extent decreases the operability of Judicial determination of excessive self-defense.The subjectivity of determination decides the vagueness of limit and the difficulty of qualification,which leads to the unsteadiness of judicial decision.The thesis discusses the effective method to determine the limit of justifiable defense by analyzing a certain case with three dimensions of defense awareness,standard of limit and basis of legitimacy.

关 键 词：防卫过当 防卫意识 限度标准 正当性 

分 类 号：D924.11[政治法律—刑法学]