检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏辅轶 WEI Fuyi(不详)
机构地区:[1]天津工业大学数字化图书馆研究中心,天津300387
出 处:《中国图书馆学报》2021年第1期34-46,共13页Journal of Library Science in China
摘 要:本文分析了张晓林和宓浩、范并思和孟广均、程焕文和杜定友这六位学者的图书馆学理论思想在逻辑基础、历史渊源和社会影响方面的三次碰撞,以及20至21世纪中国图书馆学理论发展中资源、服务和技术三个基本面代表性理论的三次"重逢"现象,即"知识服务"与"知识交流"学说的意外重逢,"图书馆2.0"与"信息资源管理"在技术发展道路上的必然相遇,"资源为王"与"三要素"的主动相遇。提出:知识服务未能在图书馆落地的原因在于缺乏需求研究,以及过度的个人依赖导致缺乏可以复制的成功模式;"图书馆2.0"运动是一场图书馆的去中心化运动,同时对图书馆人才产生了积极和消极影响;以"资源为王"为标志的寻根思潮的出现和兴起有其历史原因,但在发展中可能会遇到成本困难和理论质疑。通过时间线索的展示,提出中国图书馆学理论发展过程可能陷入了一种"莫比乌斯陷阱",这是由理论之间的张力导致的连续反馈运动形成的。最后通过分析需求与资源、服务和技术的逻辑关系得出结论:需求是联系三个基本面的核心因素,中国图书馆学理论发展只有通过需求研究将三个基本面锚定在一起,并形成理论的有序沿革与传承,才能突破"莫比乌斯陷阱"。参考文献36。This paper studies the phenomenon of three"reunions"of the representative theories of resource service and technology in the development of Chinese library science theory from the 20 th century to the 21 st century.The study analyzes the three collisions of the theory of library science between Zhang Xiaolin and Mi Hao Fan Bingsi and Meng Guangjun Cheng Huanwen and Du Dingyou in terms of logical basis historical origin and social influence.First of all this paper studies the unexpected reunion of"knowledge service"and"knowledge exchange"reflecting the different interpretations of knowledge elements in library science by two scholars in different time and space.Secondly it studies the inevitable meeting of"Library 2.0"and"information resource management"on the road of technological development.Thirdly it studies the active encounter of"Resource"is king and"three elements".At the same time the study analyzes the reason why the knowledge service fails to be implemented in the library due to the lack of demand research and excessive personal dependence.Based on the theory of Web 2.0 it puts forward that"Library 2.0"movement is a library decentralization movement and analyzes the positive and negative effects of"Library 2.0"movement on library talents.This paper studies the historical reasons for the rise of the root seeking trend marked by"Resource"is king and analyzes the cost difficulties and theoretical doubts in the development of the root seeking trend.Through the display of time clues this paper points out that the development of Chinese library science theory may fall into a"Mobius trap"In the trap the development of theory shows the characteristics of periodic repetition and the new theory lacks the necessary development space due to the reason of theoretical convergence."Mobius trap"is formed by the continuous feedback motion formed by the tension between theories.Finally through the analysis of the logical relationship between demand and resources services and technology it is concluded that demand is the c
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90