检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋玲玲[1] 高秀珍 张诚 韩丽君[3] 陈益清[3] 叶静[2] 杨玉龙 Song Lingling;Gao Xiuzhen;Zhang Cheng;Han Lijun;Chen Yiqing;Ye Jing;Yang Yulong(Department of Cholelithiasis Minimally Invasive Surgery,Affilated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University,Dalian 116001,China;Department of Gastroenterology,East Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University,Shanghai 200120,China;Cholelithiasis Center,East Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University,Shanghai 200120,China)
机构地区:[1]大连大学附属中山医院胆石病微创外科,116001 [2]同济大学附属东方医院消化内科,上海200120 [3]同济大学附属东方医院胆石病科,上海200120
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2021年第6期443-447,共5页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨短单反"α"法用于内镜下鼻胆管引流术后鼻胆管的固定效果。方法选取2019年1—10月在同济大学附属东方医院实施内镜下鼻胆管引流术679例,按随机数字表法分为试验组(短单反"α"法)155例和对照组137例(常规反"α"法),进行鼻胆管固定,比较2组患者鼻胆管固定时间、脱出率、护理时间、舒适度及胆汁引流量。结果试验组平均鼻胆管固定时间为(18.31±1.67)s,脱出率5.2%(8/155),护理时间为(35.03±2.68)s,均低于对照组的(46.50±5.50)s,13.9%(19/137)和(72.07±7.63)s,差异均有统计学意义(t/χ^(2)值为60.795、6.570、56.629,P<0.01或0.05);试验组舒适度评分为(4.61±1.06)分,胆汁引流量(241.52±53.95)ml/d,优于对照组的(5.76±0.76)分和(174.09±47.55)ml/d,差异均有统计学意义(t值为10.448、11.265,P<0.01)。结论采取短单反"α"法固定鼻胆管具有操作及护理简单、脱出率低、舒适度高、引流效果好的优点,值得临床推广。Objective To investigate the effect of short single reverse-αfixation of nasobiliary tube after endoscopic nasobiliary drainage.Methods From January 2019 to October 2019,the patients who performed with endoscopic nasolbiliary drainage in Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai East Hospital were randomly divided into experimental group(short single reverse-αfixation,155 cases)and control group(routine reverse-αfixation,137 cases).The incidences of the fixation time,prolapse rate,nursing time,scores of nasal comfort and bile flow rate of nasobiliary duct were evaluated between the two groups.Results The average time of nasobiliary duct fixation was(18.31±1.67)s,the prolapse rate was 5.2%(8/155)and the time of nursing was(35.03±2.68)s,which were lower than those of the control group(46.50±5.50)s,13.9%(19/137)and(72.07±7.63)s.The difference was statistically significant(t orχ^(2) values were 60.795,6.570,56.629,P<0.01 or 0.05).The comfort score of the experimental group was(4.61±1.06)points,the bile flow rate was(241.52±53.95)ml/days,which were higher than(5.76±0.76)points and(174.09±47.55)ml/days of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(t values were 10.448,11.265,P<0.01).Conclusions Shortening the length of nasobiliary duct combined with single reaction"α"method has the advantages of simper operation and nursing,low prolapse rate,high comfort and good drainage effect.It is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3