高校学院学术治理的价值失范与修复  

Second-Tier School’s Academic Governance Values In-normative and Recovery

作　　者：余利川 YU Lichuan(School of Public Policy&Management,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou Jiangsu 221116,China)

机构地区：[1]中国矿业大学公共管理学院,江苏徐州221116

出　　处：《北京理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第1期180-188,共9页Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：2020年江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究重大项目“高校学术治理效能评估与提升路径研究”(2020SJZDA121);2020年江苏省社科基金青年项目“研究型大学学术治理效能评估及提升机制研究”(20JYC009);2020年江苏省教育科学规划青年项目“‘双一流’建设高校学院学术治理的规制与德性研究”(C-c/2020/01/02);2018年江苏省社科基金规划项目“高校基层学术治理的制度研究”(18JYB015)。

摘　　要：价值规范遵循适当性逻辑,是内化于高校学术治理行动者的稳定动力。应然层面,高校学院学术治理价值以适当性逻辑为主导并指向遵守学术规律、维护学术道德、鼓励学术自由、强化学术胜任。然而,学院学术治理实践中行政惯性、多元主体人际互动的关系网络及人情文化传递过程诠释了治理价值失范的复杂图景:行政自上而下的价值同构,人情、科层倾轧学术理性,角色混叠与精英管治交错。回归学院学术治理价值规范,应调适学术治理的价值联动机制,消弭强人情弱学术的失范困境,监督管理者与学术精英的角色。Values maintain the appropriateness logistic, ethnic and normative is nested in academic governance actioner’s common stability performance and dominated by appropriateness logistic, its value scope including insist on academe law, protect academe moral, appreciate academe freedom and strengthen academe competence. While, management inertia, multi-actors’ interpersonal relationship network and Renqing culture deliver process during the academic governance interpreting the complicated governance in-normative scene: administrative top-down value homogeneous, Renqing and bureaucracy intervention academic ration, co-existence of middle manager’s double identity and academy elite’ government. Therefore, in order to recovery of academic normative, should clear the tunnel of two-way value interaction mechanism, counteract the dilemmas of strong Renqing and weaken academe, supervise the role of administer and academe elite.

关 键 词：学院学术治理 价值失范 价值修复 

分 类 号：G647[文化科学—高等教育学]