SuperPATH入路与后外侧入路治疗对创伤性股骨颈骨折患者的临床疗效  

Effect of total hip arthroplasty between SuperPATH approach and posterolateral approach on clinical efficacy,fracture healing and joint function in patients with traumatic femoral neck fracture

作　　者：郑少伟[1] 谢福杰 黎旭 刘伟乐[1] 钟浩博[1] 孙春汉[1] ZHENG Shaowei;XIE Fujie;LI Xu;LIU Weile;ZHONG Haobo;SUN Chunhan(Department of Orthopedics,Hui Zhou First Hospital,Huizhou 516000,China;Graduate School,Guangdong Medical University,Zhanjiang 524000,China)

机构地区：[1]惠州市第一人民医院骨科,广东惠州516000 [2]广东医科大学研究生学院,广东湛江524000

出　　处：《分子影像学杂志》2021年第1期68-73,共6页Journal of Molecular Imaging

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(81871757);广东省中医药局中医药科研项目(20202215);惠州市科技计划(2020Y049);惠州市科技计划(2012Y053);惠州市科技计划(2011Y045)。

摘　　要：目的探讨SuperPATH入路与后外侧入路治疗对创伤性股骨颈骨折患者临床疗效、骨折愈合及关节功能的影响,以探讨治疗创伤性股骨颈骨折的较为理想的方法。方法分析2017年6月~2019年6月我院因创伤性股骨颈骨折手术的病例并归列为两组:后外侧入路全髋关节置换术(对照组,n=42)和SuperPATH入路全髋关节置换术(观察组,n=54),术后采用髋关节功能Harris评分评价两组关节功能,同时对两组临床疗效[手术时间、术中出血量、总失血量、手术切口长度、术后住院时间、骨折愈合所需时间、疼痛情况、血红蛋白(Hb)、红细胞压积、C-反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)及肌酸激酶等]进行比较,组间比较行t检验。结果两组患者在术中出血、总失血量及术后住院时间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但观察组患者手术时间较对照组长,而手术切口长度及骨折愈合所需时间均短于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者术前Hb、红细胞压积、CRP、ESR及肌酸激酶比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但术后两组患者Hb、红细胞压积均较术前降低,而CRP、ESR及肌酸激酶均较术前升高,且术后两组患者Hb、红细胞压积、CRP、ESR比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但观察组肌酸激酶低于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者术前VAS和Harris评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后3 d和14 d两组患者VAS平均均较术前降低,Harris评分均较术前升高,且术后3d观察组VAS显著低于对照组,Harris评分较对照组明显升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而术后14 d两组VAS及Harris评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组均未出现并发症及假体下沉、松动。末次随访观察组活力、躯体功能、社会功能及总体健康评分均显著高于对照组患者,比较差异间具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论SuperPATH入路全髋关节置换术治疗创伤性股骨颈骨折患者较后外侧入路比较而言,更有利于减轻患者术后�Objective To explore the effect of total hip arthroplasty between Super PATH approach and posterolateral approach on clinical efficacy,fracture healing and joint function in patients with traumatic femoral neck fracture.Methods The patients with surgey for traumatic femoral neck fracture in this hospital from June 2017 to June 2019 were analyzed and classified into two groups:total hip arthroplasty through posterolateral approach(referred to as control group)(n=42),and total hip arthroplasty through SuperPATH approach(referred to as observation group)(n=54).The Harris score of hip function was used to evaluate the joint function of patients in the two groups after surgey.The clinical effects between the two groups[operation time,intraoperative blood loss,total blood loss,length of surgical incision,postoperative hospitalization time,time required for fracture healing,pain,hemoglobin(Hb),hematocrit,C-reactive protein(CRP),erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR),and creatine kinase]were statistically analyzed.The t test was used for comparison between groups.Results There was no difference in intraoperative blood loss,total blood loss and postoperative hospitalization time between two groups.However,the operation time of the observation group was longer than that of the control group,and the length of the surgical incision and the time required for fracture healing were significantly shorter than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in preoperative Hb,hematocrit,CRP,ESR and creatine kinase of patients between the two groups(P>0.05).However,after operation,Hb and hematocrit decreased in both groups,while CRP,ESR and creatine kinase increased.There was no difference of Hb,hematocrit,CRP and ESR between the two groups after operation,but the level of creatine kinase in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).There were no significant differences of preoperative VAS and Harris scores between the

关 键 词：SuperPATH入路 后外侧入路 创伤性股骨颈骨折 全髋关节置换术 临床价值 

分 类 号：R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]