检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:季卫东[1] JI Wei-dong(Law School,Shanghai Jiaotong University;China Law and Society Institute,Beijing 100872)
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学法学院中国法与社会研究院,北京100872
出 处:《现代法学》2021年第1期33-50,共18页Modern Law Science
基 金:2018年度国家社科重点规划项目“人格权保护立法研究”(18ZDA143)。
摘 要:本文主要以罗尔斯的《正义新论》为线索,探讨当今世界的贫富悬殊和社会撕裂的问题状况以及相关的政治哲学-法理学思考实验。作者指出,差别原则是理解罗尔斯正义理论的关键,而互惠性观念则是差别原则的正当化根据。从这个角度来重新认识罗尔斯正义理论,可以发现分配曲线的形式化论证的背后其实潜伏着重构宪法共识、加强东西方文明之间就秩序原理和制度设计进行深入对话的契机。Based on John Rawls’s Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,this paper explores the current problematic situation of Gini Coefficient and social disintegration in the world as well as the related political-legal thought experiment.The author points out that the difference principle is the key to understand Rawlsian theory of justice,and the concept of reciprocity is justification basis of the difference principle.From this perspective,it can be found that behind the formalistic argument of the distribution curve lies the opportunity of reconstructing the constitutional consensus and strengthening the in-depth dialogue between Eastern and Western civilizations on the principles of social order and institutional design.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3