高饱和磁感Fe_(82)Si_(3.8)B_(13.9)C_(0.3)非晶铁芯的退火及浸漆工艺  被引量:1

Annealing and dipping paint curing process of high saturation magnetic induction Fe_(82)Si_(3.8)B_(13.9)C_(0.3)amorphous core

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:宋苏 陈文智[3] 张广强 刘洋[3,4] 郑伟 张迁 周少雄 Song Su;Chen Wenzhi;Zhang Guangqiang;Liu Yang;Zheng Wei;Zhang Qian;Zhou Shaoxiong(Central Iron and Steel Research Institute,Beijing 100081,China;Jiangsu JITRI Advanced Energy&Materials Research Institute Co.,Ltd.,Changzhou Jiangsu 213000,China;Advanced Technology and Materials Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100081,China;Technology Innovation Strategic Allicance of China Amorphous Energy Saving Materials Industry,Beijing 100081,China)

机构地区:[1]钢铁研究总院,北京100081 [2]江苏集萃安泰创明先进能源材料研究院有限公司,江苏常州213000 [3]安泰科技股份有限公司,北京100081 [4]非晶节能材料产业技术创新战略联盟,北京100081

出  处:《金属热处理》2021年第2期61-66,共6页Heat Treatment of Metals

基  金:国家重点研发计划(2016YFB0300503);新型研发机构建设项目(CM20177003);北京市科技专项(Z181100000518029)。

摘  要:研究了不同磁场退火和浸漆固化工艺对Fe_(82)Si_(3.8)B_(13.9)C_(0.3)非晶合金环形铁芯损耗和磁性能的影响,并与1K101合金铁芯进行了对比。结果表明:与1K101合金相比,Fe82Si3.8B(13.9C0.3合金铁芯的最佳退火温度低于1K101合金,其中纵磁退火时达到最低,为330℃。纵磁退火Fe_(82)Si_(3.8)B_(13.9)C_(0.3)合金铁芯有着更高的饱和磁感应强度,B_(3500 A/m)=1.611 T。经350℃无磁场退火处理后,Fe_(82)Si_(3.8)B_(13.9)C_(0.3)合金铁芯的损耗P50 Hz,1.4 T=0.360 W/kg,稍高于1K101合金;经330℃纵磁退火处理后,Fe_(82)Si_(3.8)B_(13.9)C_(0.3)合金铁芯的损耗P50 Hz,1.4 T=0.257 W/kg,也高于1K101合金;经350℃横磁退火处理后损耗P50 Hz,1.4 T=0.163 W/kg,低于1K101合金。纵磁退火Fe-82Si3.8B-13.9C0.3合金铁芯经浸漆固化处理后,磁通密度B800 A/m=1.341 T,比纵磁退火1K101合金浸漆固化铁芯高15%;纵磁退火且浸漆的Fe_(82)Si_(3.8)B_(13.9)C_(0.3)合金铁芯损耗低于1K101合金浸漆铁芯,且随着频率升高优势更加明显;当频率大于1000 Hz时,纵磁退火且浸漆的Fe_(82)Si_(3.8)B_(13.9)C_(0.3)合金铁芯的损耗值低于未浸漆铁芯。Effects of different annealing and dipping paint curing processes on the loss and magnetic properties of the Fe_(82)Si_(3.8)B_(13.9)C_(0.3)amorphous alloy toroidal core were studied and compared with 1 K101 alloy core.The results indicate that the optimum annealing temperature of the Fe_(82)Si_(3.8)B_(13.9)C_(0.3)alloy core is lower than that of 1 K101 alloy,and the lowest temperature is 330℃in longitudinal magnetic annealing.Longitudinal annealed Fe_(82)Si_(3.8)B_(13.9)C_(0.3)alloy core has higher saturation magnetic induction,B3500 A/m=1.611 T.After annealing at 350℃without magnetic field,the loss of the longitudinal annealed Fe_(82)Si_(3.8)B_(13.9)C_(0.3)alloy is slightly higher than that of 1 K101 alloy,P50 Hz,1.4 T=0.360 W/kg.After longitudinal magnetic annealing at 330℃,the loss is also higher than that of the 1 K101 alloy,P50 Hz,1.4 T=0.257 W/kg.After transverse magnetic annealing at 350℃,the loss is lower than 1 K101 alloy,P_(50 Hz,1.4) T=0.163 W/kg.After cured by dipping,the magnetic flux density of the Fe_(82)Si_(3.8)B_(13.9)C_(0.3)alloy core is 15%higher than that of the 1 K101 alloy and B800 A/m=1.341 T.The core loss of the Fe_(82)Si_(3.8)B_(13.9)C_(0.3)alloy is lower than that of the 1 K101 alloy after longitudinal magnetic annealing and dipping paint curing,and the advantage is more obvious with the increase of frequency.When the frequency is higher than 1000 Hz,the loss value of longitudinal magnetic annealed and cured Fe_(82)Si_(3.8)B_(13.9)C_(0.3)alloy core is lower than that of the uncured core.

关 键 词:高饱和磁感应强度 非晶铁芯 磁场退火 浸漆固化 软磁性能 损耗 

分 类 号:TG139S8[一般工业技术—材料科学与工程]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象