检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:康燕如 王艳华[1] KANG Yan-ru;WANG Yan-hua(Law School of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
出 处:《哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报》2021年第1期23-26,共4页Journal of Social Science of Harbin Normal University
摘 要:人工智能的兴起在为人类生活带来便利的同时,也带来了许多问题,人工智能侵权问题就是其中之一。确定人工智能的法律地位是解决这个问题的前提,再结合其法律地位研究人工智能侵权的责任类型,从而具体判断人工智能侵权的责任主体,最终确定该责任的承担者以及责任范围。从目前人工智能的发展状况来看,人工智能应处于法律客体地位,人工智能侵权责任采用产品责任比较妥当,责任承担主体包括产品研发设计者、产品生产者、产品销售者和产品所有者,具体应由何者承担,应根据各自具体行为性质,由在侵权结果中的原因力比重确定。The rise of artificial intelligence brings convenience to human life,but it also brings many problems,and the infringement of artificial intelligence is one of them.The legal status of artificial intelligence is the premise to solve this problem.According to the current development of artificial intelligence,artificial intelligence should be in the position of legal object.It is more appropriate to adopt product liability for tort liability of artificial intelligence.The subject of liability includes product research and development designer,product producer,product seller and product owner.Which one should bear the liability should be determined according to the proportion of the cause force in the tort result of their specific behavior nature.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.183