检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张远照 熊勇先[1] Zhang Yuanzhao;Xiong Yongxian(Law School,Hainan University,Haikou 570228,Hainan,China)
出 处:《征信》2021年第2期33-38,46,共7页Credit Reference
基 金:2018年国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA156)。
摘 要:为信用执法相对人提供事前、事中、事后相衔接的全方位、多层次权利救济体系是信用法治应有之义。我国现行行政救济制度的事后性弊端使得其对信用执法相对人重大权益的保护十分不利,亟须构建预防性行政诉讼制度。信用预防性行政诉讼具有契合法治理念、满足依法行政要求、弥补行政救济漏洞以及适应法律全球化趋势等多重价值。构建信用预防性行政诉讼制度需要更新行政法相关理论,理性应对行政诉讼制度困境,提升司法适用能力和水平。It is the meaning of the rule of law to provide comprehensive and multi-level right relief system for the counterparty of credit law enforcement in advance,during and after the event.The drawback of the current administrative remedy system in China is very unfavorable to the protection of the major rights and interests of the counterpart in the credit law enforcement.Credit preventive administrative litigation has multiple values,such as conforming to the concept of rule of law,meeting the requirements of“administration by law”,filling up the loopholes of administrative relief and adapting to the trend of legal globalization.It is necessary for the construction of the credit preventive administrative litigation system to update the theory of administrative law,rationally respond to the predicament of administrative litigation system,and improve the judicial ability and level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62