检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:申韬[1] 甘焕凤 Shen Tao;Gan Huanfeng(Business School,Guangxi University,Nanning 530004,Guangxi,China)
出 处:《征信》2021年第2期47-51,共5页Credit Reference
基 金:国家社会科学基金西部项目(18XJY021)。
摘 要:通过文献梳理法,总结归纳中国信用评级有效性,发现以往的研究大都认为中国信用评级无效,而近年却有研究结果支持部分有效。梳理已有研究,从中发现有效与无效的侧重点与交叉点,提出四点建议:规范评级市场收费制度,增强评级机构独立性;改进信用评级模型,增强评级识别能力;进一步完善社会信用体系,增强政策约束作用;加快社会信用体系建设,强化企业信用评级主动性。With the gradual progress of the construction of“One Belt and One Road”,multinational credit investigation cooperation has become an important and necessary link,in which the effectiveness of domestic credit rating plays a key role.In the long run,whether China’s credit rating is effective has attracted many scholars to study,and their conclusions are different.Based on the literature combing method,the paper summarizes the effectiveness of China’s credit rating,and it is found that in most of the previous study China’s credit rating is considered to be invalid,while some research results in recent years support some valid conclusions.By combing the current literature,the effective and ineffective focuses and crossing points are found,and targeted suggestions such as further improving the credit rating market competition mechanism,improving the credit rating model,and further improving the social credit system are put forward to play a role in the normative development of China’s credit rating market and the construction of“One Belt and One Road”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46