检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐有超 赵浩钧 单宝强 孙作成[2] XU Youchao;ZHAO Haojun;SHAN Baoqiang;SUN Zuocheng(Department of Surgery,Weifang Medical University,Weifang 261053,China;Department of General Surgery,Weifang People's Hospital)
机构地区:[1]潍坊医学院外科学教研室,山东潍坊261053 [2]潍坊市人民医院普外科
出 处:《潍坊医学院学报》2020年第6期410-412,共3页Acta Academiae Medicinae Weifang
摘 要:目的对比分析内镜下全层切除及腹腔镜手术治疗胃间质瘤(2~5cm)的疗效和安全性。方法选取潍坊市人民医院近2年来胃间质瘤行内镜下全层切除患者38例,行腹腔镜手术患者38例,比较两组患者的近期临床疗效。结果内镜组手术时间、术中出血量、排便时间、住院时间均显著少于腹腔镜组(P<0.05)。结论对于2~5cm大小胃间质瘤,在完全切除肿瘤的情况下,内镜手术具有微创、预后好、恢复快等优点。Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic full-thickness resection and laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of gastric stromal tumor(2~5 cm).Methods Thirty-eight cases of patients with endoscopic full-thickness resection and 38 cases of laparoscopic surgery in Weifang People’s Hospital in recent 2 years were selected to compare the short-term clinical efficacy of the two groups.Results Endoscopic surgery in patients with time,intraoperative blood loss,the group defecation time,hospital stay were significantly less than the laparoscopic group(P<0.05).Conclusion For 2~5 cm gastric stromal tumor size,in the case of completely resected tumors,minimally invasive endoscopic surgery,the prognosisis good,recovery,and other advantages.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.154.82