涉合同诈骗案件中合同效力问题探究  

Research on the Validity of Contract in Contract-related Fraud Cases

作　　者：熊誉 张永江[1] Xiong Yu;Zhang Yongjiang(School of Law,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411100.China)

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411100

出　　处：《贵州警察学院学报》2020年第6期38-51,共14页Journal of Guizhou Police College

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(19BFX061)。

摘　　要：针对涉合同诈骗案中合同效力的问题,学术界提出过无效说、报案或法院判决说、参与说等,这些学说不符合法律规定,且不能合理解决合同效力问题。对于刑民交叉案件,应该以民法规定和原理确定合同效力,并通过理论方法确定刑法规定究竟能否影响合同的效力,这样既符合法律规定,也能维护受害人的权益。以民法原理确认法律效力逐渐为司法实践所接纳,越来越多刑民交叉案件中使用"刑民分立"的判决。As for the validity of contract in contract-related fraud cases,the academics have come up with the theories about invalid contracts,reporting cases to security authorities or getting court’s decisions,the parties’getting involved in crimes.etc.None of these theories is in accordance with the legal provisions or capable of reasonably solving the problem related to the validity of contract.For cases involving both criminal and civil liability,the validity of the contract should be determined based on the provisions and principles of the civil law,and theoretical methods should be applied to determine whether the provisions of the criminal law have effects on the validity of the contract.This will conform to the legal provisions and protect the rights and interests of the victims.To determine the legal validity based on the principles of civil law has gradually been accepted in judicial practice,and more and more cases involving both criminal and civil liability have been judged by"separating criminal liability from civil liability".

关 键 词：刑民交叉 合同效力 强制性性质 刑法与民法的关系 “先刑后民”原则 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]