论证抑或评估:地方立法立项的程序选择  

Argumentation or Assessment:The Selection of Procedure for Project Setup During Local Legislation

作　　者：朱最新[1,2] Zhu Zuixin

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学法学院 [2]广东省地方立法研究评估与咨询服务基地

出　　处：《地方立法研究》2021年第2期27-37,共11页Local Legislation Journal

基　　金：广东省普通高校社会科学重点项目(2019WZDXM004)“地方立法评估理论与实务研究”;教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“粤港澳大湾区法律建设研究”(20JZD019)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：《立法法》《规章制定程序条例》确立了立项论证评估制度,但并未具体规定和展开。各地在探索立法立项论证评估制度具体化过程中呈现出不同的走向,影响着立项的质量与效率。立法立项论证评估制度的地方优化必须要有概念框架的支撑。然而,何谓“论证评估”,法律并未明确。从规范分析视角看,立项论证评估是指立法立项必须经过立项论证或者立项评估。其中,立项论证是地方立法立项论证评估的一般程序,立项评估是地方立法立项论证评估的特别程序。在此法律意涵下,从地方实际出发,对地方立法立项论证制度、立项评估制度予以具体化、规范化,以实现地方立法立项制度的精细化,助推地方立法迈入高质量立法的新时代。The Argumentation and Assessment System for Project Setup(AASPS)has been established by Legislation Law and Rules Formulating Procedure Regulation.However,it has never been well implemented.Exploration of AASPS by Local Legislations has shown different trends,affecting the quality and efficiency of such projects.The local optimization of AASPS must be supported by a conceptual framework.However,the definition of“argumentation and assessment”has never been clearly provided.In the view of normative analysis,it means that legislation project setup should go through project argumentation or project assessment.Furthermore,project argumentation is a general procedure for local AASPS,while project assessment is a special one.Project argumentation and project evaluation need be implemented and normalized from the local needs.It can refine the system of project setup for local legislation,improve the quality and efficiency of the project,and promote local legislation into a new era of high-quality legislation.

关 键 词：地方立法 立项论证 立项评估 高质量立法 

分 类 号：D927[政治法律—法学]