检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩超 Han Chao(School of Literature,Nanjing University;Nanjing Library)
机构地区:[1]南京大学文学院,江苏南京200018 [2]南京图书馆历史文献部,江苏南京200018
出 处:《图书馆杂志》2020年第12期163-171,154,共10页Library Journal
摘 要:南京图书馆藏有一种《四库全书总目》红格稿本残稿,其底稿为工楷墨字,行款与《四库全书》原抄一致,又有朱墨二笔校改。笔者将之与《天津图书馆藏纪晓岚删定〈四库全书总目〉稿本》、文澜阁《四库全书总目》原写本、浙本、殿本《四库全书总目》等比勘,发现浙本与文澜阁原写本《总目》、天津图书馆藏纪晓岚删定稿本不一致者,皆与南图本一致。尤其是无关文义、无人注意的一些文字,与他本皆异而独与南图本合,可以确认南图本为浙本底本。进而证明,浙本并非据文澜阁抄本刊刻,亦非以文澜阁抄本为底本参校其他文本刊刻,而是据四库馆撰写的早期《四库全书总目》稿本为底本,校以文澜阁抄本,再吸收卢氏、王氏等多家校勘成果而成的一种"整理本"。There is a fragmented red grid manuscript of Catalogue of Siku collected in Nanjing Library.It is written in ink,style of Gong Kai,official script,and proofread in red and black.Its number of lines and words is in line with the original copy of the Siku.The author compares it with four copies:the manuscript of Catalogue of Siku revised by Ji Xiaolan in Tianjin Library,the original manuscript of the Siku by Wenyuge,the copy of Zhejiang and the copy of Wuyingdian.It is found that the copy of Zhejiang is consistent with the copy in Nanjing Library,but different from the manuscript of Wenlan and Tianjin Library.In particular,given that some irrelevant and unattended texts in the copy of Zhejiang are the same as the copy of Nanjing Library,but different from the other copies,it can be confirmed that the copy of Nanjing Library is the base of the copy of Zhejiang.It is further proved that the copy of Zhejiang was not based on the manuscript of Wenlan,nor its other copies annotated with text,but based on the original Catalogue of Siku written by Siku Museum.The copy of Zhejiang is a collection,proofread on the transcript of Wenlan,and included the proofreading of Lu and Wang.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28