赋予司法警察有限侦查权的理性探究  

Rational Exploration on the Limited Investigative Power of the Judicial Police

作　　者：宁佳 Ning Jia

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院

出　　处：《学术前沿》2021年第2期90-93,共4页Frontiers

摘　　要：拒执罪对于治理执行难颇具意义,但在实践中却难以发挥实效,存在着刑事打击效果不佳、诉讼过程衔接不畅等问题。无论是公诉模式之中的角色混乱、职能僭越,还是自诉模式中的取证能力不足,都使拒执罪中侦查权力的重新分配成为必要与可能。为了达到资源的有效整合、权力效益最大化以及执行利益最大化的目的,应该将拒执罪中的侦查权进行重新分配。赋权之后,不仅要求司法警察严格恪守权力运行原则,还要以权力制约权力、权利限制权力的方式来保障司法警察侦查权的有效克制与谦抑。The crime of refusing to execute court judgments (the "Crime") is of great significance to overcoming the difficulty in executing court judgments,but it can hardly play an effective role in practice.There are some problems such as the weak effect of criminal penalty and the unsmooth litigation process.Redistributing the power for investigating the Crime has been warranted and become possible due to both the confusing roles and intertwined functions in the mode of public prosecution and the weak ability to collect evidence in the mode of private prosecution.In order to effectively integrate resources and maximize the power benefits and executive interests,the investigative power relating to the Crime should be redistributed.After being empowered,the judicial police should not only strictly abide by the principle of power operation,but also ensure an effective restraint of and modesty in their investigative power by balancing it and restricting their rights.

关 键 词：司法警察 侦查权 拒执罪 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]