“不能要个人对这些关系负责” --《资本论》对资本主义的非谴责性批判  

Can Less than Any Other Make the Individual Responsible for Relations:non-condemnation Critique on Capitalism in Das Kapital

作　　者：高超 GAO Chao(Institute of Philosophy,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing,China,100732;Department of Philosophy,Jilin University,Changchun,Jilin,China,130012)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院哲学研究所,北京100732 [2]吉林大学哲学系,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《贵州大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第1期10-17,119,共9页Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“《资本论》科学性问题研究”(19YJC720010)。

摘　　要：有学者认为马克思谴责资本主义是因为它不正义,有学者则认为马克思谴责资本主义是出于别的理由,但他们都承认马克思谴责了资本主义。然而,这些学者的论证存在理论困难。马克思在《资本论》中把人类社会的演变理解为一种“自然史”的过程,因而既不认为资本主义是不正义的,也不认为资本主义是正义的,而是认为资本主义是自然的。所以,谴责资本主义既缺乏充分的理由,也不会产生实际的效果。对《资本论》进行哲学和道德的解读是违背马克思本意的,捍卫和发展马克思主义应该坚持科学的道路。Some scholars hold that Marx condemns capitalism because of its injustice,while others think that Marx condemns capitalism for other reasons,but they all admit that Marx condemns capitalism.However,there are theoretical difficulties in these scholars’argumentation.In Das Kapital,Marx regarded the evolution of human society as a process of“natural history”.Therefore,from his point of view,capitalism is neither unjust nor just,but it is natural.Therefore,condemning capitalism is neither justified nor effective.It is against Marx’s original intention to interpret Das Kapital philosophically and morally.To defend and develop Marxism,we should adhere to the scientific way.

关 键 词：《资本论》 资本主义 正义 

分 类 号：A12[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]