检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:北京市门头沟区人民检察院课题组 Research Group of People's Procuratorate of Mentougou District,Beijing
机构地区:[1]不详
出 处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2021年第1期8-12,共5页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
基 金:“北京市人民检察院2020年度检察理论研究课题”的阶段性研究成果,项目编号:BJ2020B31。
摘 要:当前认罪认罚从宽制度重点聚焦被追诉人的权益保护,而对被害人权益保护却重视不够,存在知情权保障有限、参与权保障不足、赔偿范围偏窄、缺乏值班律师援助等问题和不足,亟待加以完善解决。文章通过梳理认罪认罚从宽制度下的被害人权益保护现状,分析总结存在的问题,并有针对性地提出完善路径,以期对被害人权益保护研究有所裨益。The current leniency system of pleading guilty and accepting punishment focuses on the protection of the rights and interests of the accused,while lacks attention of the rights and interests of the victims.Limited right to know,poorly protected right to participate,confined scope of compensation,insufficient legal aid from duty lawyers demand prompt perfection and solution.In order to benefit the research of the protection of the victims’rights and interests,this article analyzes and summarizes the existing problems through sorting the status of the victims’rights and interests protection system on the background of the leniency system for pleading guilty and accepting punishment,and puts forward targeted improving ways.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15