检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱珠 许畅[1] 牛妞 Zhu Zhu;Xu Chang;Niu Niu(Department of Colorectal Surgery,Jiangsu Cancer Hospital,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210009,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏省肿瘤医院结直肠外科,江苏南京210009
出 处:《医药前沿》2020年第34期6-8,共3页Journal of Frontiers of Medicine
摘 要:难治性伤口的治疗一直是临床的难题,近年来随着伤口负压治疗的广泛应用,使该情况得到明显好转。伤口负压治疗能够有效促进伤口的血流状态,加快细胞和肉芽生长、快速缩小伤口、减少治疗时间。但在伤口负压的治疗中,对于不同填充敷料的效果,临床仍存在争议。本文将对伤口负压治疗中填塞不同辅料的研究进展进行综述。The treatment of refractory wounds has always been a difficult problem in clinical practice.In recent years,with the wide application of negative pressure treatment of wounds,the situation has been significantly improved.The negative pressure treatment can effectively promote the blood flow of the wound,accelerate the growth of cells and granulas,rapidly shrink the wound,and reduce the treatment time.However,in the treatment of wound negative pressure,the clinical effects of different filling dressings are still controversial.In this paper,the research progress of different excipients in the treatment of wound negative pressure is reviewed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.228