工商资本下乡会导致农户农地利用“非粮化”吗?——来自CLDS的经验证据  

Will Industrial and Commercial Capitals Investing in Agriculture Lead to“Non-grain”Use of Farmers’Land?Empirical Evidence from the CLDS Data

作　　者：江光辉 胡浩[1] JIANG GuangHui;HU Hao(College of Economics and Management,Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing 210095)

机构地区：[1]南京农业大学经济管理学院,江苏南京210095

出　　处：《财贸研究》2021年第3期41-51,共11页Finance and Trade Research

基　　金：江苏省高校研究生科研创新计划项目“工商资本进入、交易成本与畜牧产业链纵向整合研究”(KYCX20_0612);江苏省高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)。

摘　　要：基于农业生产要素配置的视角,构建“工商资本下乡—农地流转/机械替代—农户粮食生产”的理论分析框架,并利用CLDS 2016数据进行验证。研究发现:工商资本下乡租赁农地促使农户农地转出,不利于农户维持粮食生产,而工商资本下乡提供生产性服务则促进了农户农地转入以及增加机械要素投入,有利于农户扩大粮食生产;村庄地形条件和经济区位在其中发挥了调节效应。因此,建议鼓励和引导工商资本下乡积极参与农业生产性服务体系建设,促进农户农地流转和机械化水平提升,同时应充分发挥地理位置和资源禀赋优势,因地制宜采取不同的生产性服务供给策略。Based on the perspective of factor allocation,this paper constructs a theoretical framework of“industrial and commercial capitals investing in agriculture-land transfer/mechanical substitution-farmers’grain production”,and conducts empirical tests by using CLDS data.The results show that land requisition by industrial and commercial capital promotes farmer’s land out,which is not conducive to farmers’maintenance of grain production,while the industrial and commercial capital’s provision of social services promotes farmer’s land in and increases the input of mechanical,which is conducive to the expansion of grain production by farmers.And the village’s topographical conditions and economic location play a regulatory role in it.Therefore,it is recommended to encourage and guide industrial and commercial capital to actively participate in the construction of agricultural productive service system,promote land transfer and mechanization of farmers,and give full play to the advantages of geographical location and resource endowments,and adopt different productive service supply strategies according to local conditions.

关 键 词：工商资本下乡 农地租赁 生产性服务供给 要素配置 粮食生产 

分 类 号：F321.1[经济管理—产业经济]