检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张娇磊 李进[1] 郑先超[2] 赵花静[3] 李青宁[1] ZHANG Jiaolei;LI Jin;ZHENG Xianchao;ZHAO Huajing;LI Qingning(School of Civil Engineering,Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology,Xi’an 710055,China;School of Civil and Architectural Engineering,Anyang Institute of Technology,Anyang 455000,Henan,China;School of Science,Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology,Xi’an 710055,China)
机构地区:[1]西安建筑科技大学土木工程学院,西安710055 [2]安阳工学院土木与建筑工程学院,河南安阳455000 [3]西安建筑科技大学理学院,西安710055
出 处:《哈尔滨工业大学学报》2021年第4期111-119,共9页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology
基 金:国家自然科学基金(51678474);陕西省自然科学基金(2019JQ-765);教育厅专项科研计划(18JK1420)。
摘 要:为研究一种外包钢管栓筋连接的装配式钢筋混凝土框架结构的抗倒塌性能,完成了3根足尺装配式整体式长柱试验。首先使用有限元软件SAP2000中的多段线性塑性连结单元提出了一种简化的装配式柱模型,模拟出了该柱-柱节点,并与试验结果比较。然后采用抽柱法对一栋6层外包钢管栓筋连接的装配式框架结构和现浇框架结构进行连续倒塌分析,分别抽除首层角柱、首层长边中柱、首层短边中柱、首层内柱四种工况,得到了抽柱后的关键构件内力、位移时程曲线;最后通过Pushdown曲线分析装配与现浇结构的倒塌机制。研究结果表明:多段线性塑性连接单元较好地模拟了装配式柱-柱节点,模拟值与试验值比较吻合;在设计荷载作用下,四种工况中内柱的破坏对装配结构影响最大,其位移比现浇结构大了72.2%;在抗力曲线中发现,角柱破坏时是装配结构梁机制的承载力最低的情况,比现浇结构小了25.4%,内柱破坏时是装配结构悬链线机制的承载力最低的情况,比现浇结构小了33.1%。最终得出需要加强装配结构的内柱和边柱及其相邻梁构件的截面尺寸和配筋,以及外包钢管的厚度来提高其刚度,本文可为此类装配式结构的后续工程应用提供一种抗倒塌设计参考。To study the progressive collapse of a prefabricated reinforced concrete frame structure(PRCS)with steel tube bolted connection,three full-scale prefabricated long columns were tested.First,a simplified prefabricated column model was proposed by using the multi-stage linear plastic connection element in SAP2000.The column-column joint was simulated and compared with test results.Then,a six-story PRCS connected by steel tube bolted bars and a six-story cast-in-place reinforced concrete frame structure(CRCS)were analyzed by removing column method.Four working conditions were removed,namely,the corner column,the long side middle column,the short side middle column,and the inner column of the first floor.The internal force and displacement time history curve of key components were obtained after removing the columns.Lastly,the collapse mechanisms of PRCS and CRCS were analyzed through Pushdown curves.Results show that the multi-stage linear plastic connection element well simulated the prefabricated column-column joint,and the simulation value was consistent with the test value.Under design load,the failure of the inner column had the greatest impact on the PRCS,and its displacement was 72.2%larger than that of the CRCS.By analyzing the Pushdown curves,it was found that when the corner column was damaged,the bearing capacity of the PRCS under beam mechanism was the lowest,which was 25.4%less than that of CRCS,and the lowest bearing capacity was 33.1%less than that of CRCS when the inner column was damaged.Finally,the section size and reinforcement of the inner and side columns and their adjacent beam members that are needed to be strengthened,as well as the thickness of the outer steel tube,were obtained to improve their rigidity.Therefore,this paper can provide reference for the collapse resistance design of the subsequent engineering application of such prefabricated structures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38