检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶世斌 YE Shi-bin(College of Marxism,Hechi University,Hechi 546300,Guangxi,China)
机构地区:[1]河池学院马克思主义学院,广西河池546300
出 处:《湖北农业科学》2021年第5期188-192,共5页Hubei Agricultural Sciences
基 金:2017年度国家社会科学基金西部项目“精准扶贫的财富伦理策略研究”(17XKS010)。
摘 要:以是否需要对贫困人员进行身份识别为前提开展社会救助,系统梳理了中国古代社会和西方国家社会救助理念和政策,发掘出政策背后的经济社会原因、政策的实际效果、政策的影响与缺陷。对以贫困人员身份识别为前提的差异化救助与全面保障体系的优缺点进行对比分析。结果表明,对贫困人员身份识别的救助效果更精准,对国家财政资金支持的需求更少,对社会公平的影响更小,对经济社会发展的正向影响更好。其优越性是全面保障体系或者全民现金补助计划所不能比拟的。无论是应对常态化的因素导致特定的贫困,还是突发性社会危机引发的贫困,都应当坚持以贫困人员身份识别为前提的差异性社会救助模式。Based on the premise of whether it is necessary to identify the poor,this study systematically sorted out the concepts and policies of social assistance in ancient Chinese society and Western countries,and explored the economic and social reasons behind the policies,the actual effects of the policies,the influence and defects of the policies.On the premise of poor personnel identification differentiation assistance and comprehensive security system,this paper compared and analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of them.The results show that the identification of relief for poor personnel effect is more accurate,less demand for national finance capital support,less impact on social justice,the positive influence to the economic and social development is better.Its advantages are comprehensive security system or universal cash benefit scheme can not be compared.Whether it is to deal with the specific poverty caused by the normal factors or the poverty caused by the sudden social crisis,we should adhere to the differential social relief mode based on the premise of the identification of the poor.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62