检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宁芳芳[1] NING Fangfang(Shenyang Fifth People's Hospital,Shenyang 110023,China)
出 处:《中国医药指南》2021年第5期63-64,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨胰岛素不同给药方式对糖尿病患者血糖控制效果的影响。方法选取我院于2018年1月至2019年1月收治的100例糖尿病患者为研究对象,以随机数字表法分为两组,各50例;其中对照组采取常规皮下注射治疗,观察组采取胰岛素泵持续皮下注射治疗,比较两组的临床治疗效果。结果治疗后,观察组患者血糖达标时间、胰岛素用量、空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖、糖化血红蛋白水平、低血糖发生率均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论临床针对糖尿病患者,予以胰岛素泵持续皮下注射治疗的效果明显优于常规皮下注射治疗。Objective To investigate the effect of different insulin administration on blood glucose control in diabetic patients. Methods From January 2018 to January 2019,100 diabetic patients were treated in our hospital, they were divided into two groups by random number table, 50 cases in each group. The control group was treated with routine subcutaneous injection. The observation group was treated by continuous subcutaneous injection of insulin pump. The clinical treatment effect of the two groups was compared. Results After treatment, the observation group patients’ blood glucose reaching standard time, insulin dosage, fasting blood glucose, 2 h postprandial blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin level, and incidence of hypoglycemia were better than those in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion In clinical for diabetics, the effect of continuous subcutaneous injection of insulin pump is better than that of routine subcutaneous injection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222