开放获取S计划演进历程、动因及对我国的启示  

The Development and Motivation of the Plan S to the Practice and Inspiration of Open Access in China

作　　者：崔丽媛[1] 刘春丽[1] Cui Liyuan;Liu Chunli(Library of China Medical University,Shenyang 110122)

机构地区：[1]中国医科大学图书馆,沈阳110122

出　　处：《图书情报工作》2021年第4期102-110,共9页Library and Information Service

基　　金：2020年辽宁省教育厅科学研究经费项目-青年科技人才“育苗”项目“COVID-19科研成果的学术影响力、社会关注度及临床转化潜力评价与预测研究”(项目编号:QNRW2020004)研究成果之一。

摘　　要：[目的/意义]以利益相关者-科学共同体为视角,分析S计划的政策演变,及对我国开放获取实践发展的启示。[方法/过程]运用文献调研法与内容分析法,追踪S计划的演进历程,对标志性事件的发生时间节点、内容及相关政策进行分析;梳理S计划的最新动态,包括S计划对科学共同体影响的监控框架、权利保留政策及钻石开放获取的新模式。[结果/结论]聚焦政策的深层解读并挖掘内在动因,包括S计划被科学共同体的采纳受到资历、国别、学科的影响;科学共同体难以进行绿色开放获取存储;难以识别“掠夺性期刊”;影响学术出版自由选择。最后提出设置开放获取专员、制定APC相关政策、强化期刊出版机构质量管理、推进机构知识库的常态化建设等措施,以期对我国开放获取实践提供借鉴与参考。[Purpose/significance]From the perspective of the researchers,this study empirically analyzed the changes and differences of the policies for the Plan S.In order to inspire the practice of open access in China.[Method/process]It used the method of literature research and content analysis.Based on the development of Plan S,we analyzed the content of the target policy.We focused on the recent new,including monitoring the effects of Plan S,rights retention strategy and Diamond Open Access.[Result/conclusion]Focus on the deep interpretation of the policy and dig the internal motivation,the Plan S are affected by qualifications,countries,subjects,the difficulty of the Green Open Access and the difficulty to distinguish predatory journal for the researchers.Therefore,setting up Open Access professional staff,formulating APC policy,reinforcing quality management of journals and promoting the construction of institutional repository.These policies of the Plan S may have positive influence on the polities of China.

关 键 词：S计划 科学共同体 开放获取 动因 

分 类 号：G239[文化科学]