分合同人法律责任制度的解析与重构——以完善海商法模式为途径  

Review and reconstruction of the liability system of the merchant’s subcontractor by way of improving the maritime law mode

作　　者：陈喜燕[1] CHEN Xi-yan(Law School,Shanghai Maritime University,Shanghai 201306,China)

机构地区：[1]上海海事大学法学院,上海201306

出　　处：《中国海商法研究》2021年第1期87-94,共8页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law

基　　金：2018年度国家社科基金重大项目“新时代海洋强国战略法制保障研究”(18VHQ004);交通运输部2017年度交通运输战略规划政策项目“国际海运业反垄断豁免问题研究”(2017-5-6)。

摘　　要：分合同人作为合同法上的第三人,造成商人违约后,对商人的债权人的责任承担在中国现行法律体系中有三种模式:坚持合同相对性的合同法模式、对分合同人进行区分的旅游法模式、强调连带责任的海商法模式,这三种模式分别对应民事合同、消费合同、商事合同。分合同人法律责任制度的碎片化损害了商事活动的安全与效率,也不利于对消费者的保护。中国应借鉴海商法模式,突破合同相对性,构建统一的分合同人法律责任制度。As a third party under the contract law,the subcontractor may assume his liability by separate ways:the contract law mode of insisting the privity of contract,the tourism law mode of differentiating subcontractor,and the maritime law mode of emphasizing joint and several liability.These modes are designed for civil contract,consumer contract,and commercial contract respectively.The fragment of the subcontractor’s liability regime imperils safety and efficiency which are necessary for running business and can not protect consumers’interests.A unified liability system of subcontractor therefore shall be established on the basis of the maritime law mode by breaking the privity of contract.

关 键 词：分合同人 违约责任 侵权责任 连带责任 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]