物权法定缓和的绝处逢生与继续完善——《民法典》规定“其他具有担保功能的合同”概念价值  

Renascence and Perfection in Moderation of Numerus Clausus——The merits of the concept of “other contracts with the security function” prescribed in the Civil Code

作　　者：杨立新[1] Yang Lixin

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学

出　　处：《上海政法学院学报（法治论丛）》2021年第1期45-53,共9页Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science & Law(The Rule of Law Forum)

基　　金：2018年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“民法典编纂的内部和外部体系研究”的阶段性研究成果,项目编号:18ZDA141。

摘　　要：《民法典》第388条规定了"其他具有担保功能的合同"的概念,学说作出了不同的解说,使意定担保物权不只局限于《民法典》的物权编,也扩展到合同编规定的所有权保留、融资租赁和保理等具有担保功能的合同,扩展了担保物权的类型。但是,规定"其他具有担保功能的合同"概念的更重要价值,是将《民法典》以及其他没有法律规定的让与担保等具有担保功能的合同纳入了担保物权的范围,使《民法典》规定的刚性物权法定原则增加了柔性,实现了担保物权类型的缓和,对于其他物权类型的缓和也提出了新的思路。通过制定法、法官法和习惯法的扩张,进一步扩大物权法定缓和的适用范围,将使我国的物权法定原则具有弹性,能够更好地为社会经济发展和交易实践服务。About the concept of "other contracts with the security function" prescribed in the Art. 388 of the Civil Code, scholars have different annotations, not only to security rights by agreement out of the range of Part Ⅱ Property Rights in the Civil Code, but also to the security agreements of title retention, finance lease, factoring, and so on, which enrich the types of security rights. However, more merits reflected in prescribing the concept of "other contracts with the security function" is that, bringing security agreements not prescribed in the Civil Code or any other laws and regulations like alienation guarantee, into the scope of security rights, increasing flexibility in the rigid numerus clausus principle in the Civil Code, realizing the moderation of types of usufruct rights, and proposing new ideas of moderation of other types of property rights. Through expansions of statutes, judge-made laws and common laws, the further extension of the application scope of the moderation of numerus clausus, will make flexible the numerus clausus principle in our country, and improve the socioeconomic development and transaction practice.

关 键 词：《民法典》 物权法定原则 物权法定缓和 其他具有担保功能的合同 

分 类 号：DF521[政治法律—民商法学]