检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨珍增[1] 郭晓翔 YANG Zhenzeng;GUO Xiaoxiang(School of Economics,Tianjin University of Finance and Economics,Tianjin 300222)
出 处:《国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报)》2021年第1期18-31,共14页INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“融资约束视角下的跨国公司国际生产分割机理研究”(16YJC790122)。
摘 要:利用世界银行2012年中国企业调查数据,采用倾向得分匹配法考察企业与不同类型伙伴的合作研发对企业出口绩效的影响。结果表明,合作研发对企业出口规模和出口选择具有显著的促进作用,对出口强度则没有显著影响;不同类型合作研发的促进作用存在明显差异,与大学和科研机构的合作研发促进作用最强,与企业合作研发的作用次之,内部合作研发的作用最弱。而且在供应链内部,与供应商合作的效果优于与客户公司合作。进一步研究发现,合作研发对出口绩效的促进作用主要发生在市场化水平较高的地区。研究结论对促进企业合作创新、提高创新效率、促进出口绩效提升、建设创新型国家和全面提高对外开放水平具有政策参考意义。Using the World Bank China Enterprise Survey 2012 data,this paper applies the Propensity Score Matching(PSM)to examine the impact of cooperative research and development with different types of partners on export performance.We find that cooperative R&D significantly boosts export size and improves export choice,but has no significant impact on export intensity.The promotion effects differ in the types of cooperative R&D:the cooperation with universities and scientific research institutions has the strongest promotion,that with other enterprises has less strong one,and the intra-enterprise cooperation has the weakest.Within the supply chain,cooperation with suppliers is better than that with customer companies.Moreover,the promotion of cooperative R&D to export performance mainly occurs in areas with high market-oriented levels.The conclusion of this paper is of significant policy implications for promoting cooperative innovation,enhancing innovation efficiency,improving export performance,building an innovative country and raising the level of opening up.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222