马克思主义中国化研究中的“区分割裂论”驳议  

A Refutation of the Theory of“Division and Separation”in the Study of Sinicization of Marxism

作　　者：王刚 WANG Gang(School of Marxism,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210046,China)

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学马克思主义学院,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《江西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2021年第1期34-40,共7页Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“马克思主义中国化史中若干基本问题研究”(编号:16BKS034)。

摘　　要：马克思主义中国化,既是中国共产党提出的一个重要政治命题,也是一个重要理论命题;既指向结合的“过程”,也指向结合的“结果”,因而具有鲜明的“二重性”。在认识这种“二重性”时,有人形成了所谓的“区分割裂论”。事实上,马克思主义中国化是集政治性和学术性于一体的,并且政治和学术之间本来就存在某种程度的关联,二者须臾不可离分;同样,马克思主义与中国实际相结合,是马克思主义与中国实践、中国历史文化“两个结合”,而不是“一个结合”;马克思主义与中国实际相结合的“结果”也不仅仅是理论成果,它还有实践成果和制度成果,是“三个成果”的统一。The Sinicization of Marxism is not only an important political proposition put forward by the Communist Party of China,but also an important theoretical proposition.It points both to the“process”and the“result”of combination,so it has a distinct characteristic of“duality”.During the process of comprehending the“duality”,some people began to form an idea of the so-called“division and separation theory”.In fact,the Sinicization of Marxism is a combination of the nature of politics and academy.To some extent,there is a connection between the politics and academy,and the two cannot be separated for a moment.Similarly,the combination of Marxism with China’s reality is the combination of Marxism with China’s practice and Chinese history and culture,rather than“a combination”;the“result”of the combination of Marxism and China’s reality is not only the theoretical result,but also the practical result and the systematic result,and is the unity of the“three results”.

关 键 词：马克思主义中国化 “二重性” “区分割裂论” 

分 类 号：A8[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]