检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙山[1,2] SUN Shan
机构地区:[1]西北政法大学经济法学院 [2]上海交通大学凯原法学院博士后科研流动站
出 处:《北方法学》2021年第2期36-43,共8页Northern Legal Science
基 金:2018年国家社会科学基金一般项目“应对国际贸易知识产权制度变革的中国方案研究”(18BFX219)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:以往的研究对专利诉讼中停止侵害请求权行使的限制问题少有关注,这种研究思路容易导致错误的理论方向,矫枉过正与保护不力同样属于误区。停止侵害请求权行使受限有其立法层面和司法层面的原因。目前我国仅在司法解释中规定了停止侵害请求权行使的限制,具体内容仍有待明确和补充。司法适用中应当对属于弹性的概念"国家利益""公共利益"进行严格限定,要以利益指向的内容本身而非被诉侵权主体的性质作为判定标准。对于基于双方利益的考量限制行使停止侵害请求权的情形,同样应严格适用。Previous researches paid little attention to the limitation of suspension of infringement claims in patent litigation and this kind of research method tends to form the wrong theoretical orientation.Overcorrection and inadequate protection are both errors.There are legislative and judicial reasons for the limitation of the right for suspension of infringement claims.At present,China only provides the restriction of claim for suspension of infringement in the judicial interpretation,while the specific content is still to be clarified and supplemented.In judicial application,the elastic concepts of"national interest and public interest"should be strictly defined,and the determination criteria should be based on the content of the interest orientation rather than the nature of the accused tort subject.It is also strictly applicable to situations where the exercise of the right of suspension of infringement is restricted based on the interests of both parties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.235