检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蹇洁 郭雨 姜林 苏加福 JIAN Jie;GUO Yu;JIANG Lin;SU Jiafu(School of Modern Post,Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Chongqing 400065,China;Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Electronic Commerce&Supply Chain System,Chongqing Technology and Business University,Chongqing 400067,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆邮电大学现代邮政学院,重庆400065 [2]重庆工商大学电子商务及供应链系统重庆市重点实验室,重庆400067
出 处:《计算机集成制造系统》2021年第3期943-953,共11页Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(15BGL204);重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究资助项目(17SKG058)。
摘 要:为研究环境效益对绿色供应链最优决策的影响,基于多目标优化与博弈理论,构建了制造商同时考虑利润与环境双目标下的供应链博弈模型,分析了集中式与制造商主导Stackelberg博弈模式下的供应链决策,并进一步建立了利润共享契约下的博弈模型,对以上3种均衡结果进行比较。研究表明,制造商考虑环境效益目标会使自身利润减少,零售商利润、产品绿色度与环境效益相应提高,整体供应链利润先增大后减少;而利润共享契约能够实现产品绿色度、环境效益以及供应链各成员间利润的多重协调。To research the influence of environmental benefits on optimal decision for green supply chain,a supply chain game model with profit and environment simultaneously considered by manufacturer was constructed based on multi-objective optimization and game theory,the decision for supply chain model under centralized,manufacturer-led Stackelberg game and profit-sharing contract was analyzed,and the above three equilibrium results were compared.The results showed that the manufacturer's profit would be reduced after considering the target of environmental benefits,while the retailer's profit,product greenness and environmental benefits was increased.However,a profit-sharing contract could realize multi-coordination of product green degree,profit and environmental benefits of the whole supply chain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.85.192