检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽财经大学金融学院 [2]浙江工商大学统计学院,杭州310018
出 处:《金融论坛》2021年第3期21-29,59,共10页Finance Forum
基 金:安徽财经大学研究生科研创新基金项目(ACYC2019085)。
摘 要:本文对比研究央行沟通对企业投资的短周期引导能力。结果显示:在短周期内由于传导时滞,利率渠道的货币政策难以引导企业增加投资;信贷渠道的货币政策对企业投资有一定的引导作用;央行沟通能够通过预期渠道引导企业投资,但单独实行央行沟通的引导作用仍然有限。如果在进行央行沟通的同时配合信贷政策影响企业持有现金,就可能在短周期引导企业增加投资。此外,企业财务杠杆会减弱央行沟通的效果,企业投资价值对央行沟通效果没有显著影响。This paper makes a comparative study of the short-term guiding ability of central bank communication to enterprise investment.The results show that:in the short period,due to the transmission delay,it is difficult for the monetary policy to guide enterprises to increase investment through interest rate channel,while a certain guiding effect exists through credit channel;the central bank communication can guide enterprises’investment through the expectation channel,but the guiding effect of the central bank communication alone is still limited.If the central bank communicates is used with the credit policy together to influence the cash holdings of enterprises,it may lead enterprises to increase investment in a short period.In addition,the financial leverage of enterprises will weaken the effect of central bank communication,and the val-ue of enterprise investment has no significant impact on the effect of central bank communication.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.124.77