不同采血方法进行血常规检验的价值分析  

Value Analysis of Routine Blood test by Different Blood Collection Methods

作　　者：佟奎鸿 赵毅[1] TONG Kuihong;ZHAO Yi(People's Liberation Army Northern Battle Area Air Force Hospital,Shenyang 110000,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民解放军北部战区空军医院,辽宁沈阳110000

出　　处：《中国医药指南》2021年第9期126-127,共2页Guide of China Medicine

摘　　要：目的分析采血法以及末梢采血法开展血常规检验的具体价值。方法选择2017年6月至2018年6月来我院接受血常规检验的116例受试者为研究对象,将其分为两组。每组58例。对照组应用末梢采血法,观察组应用静脉血采血法,分析两种不同采血方式取得结果的精准性。结果相较于对照组,观察组受试者的RBC、PLT、HCT、WBC以及Hb更为精准,P<0.05;两组受试者的MCHC、MCH以及MCV差异不显著,P>0.05。结论与末梢采血法相比,静脉采血法血液循环性更好,成分更为稳定,有助于确保最终检验结果的精准度,为医师诊断疾病提供更有用的信息。Objective To analyze the specific value of blood collection method and peripheral blood collection method in carrying out routine blood test.Methods One hundred and sixteen subjects who received routine blood tests in our hospital from June 2017 to June 2018 were selected as research objects,and divided into two groups.There were 58 patients in each group.Peripheral blood collection method was used in the control group,and venous blood collection method was used in the observation group.The accuracy of the results obtained by the two different blood collection methods was analyzed.Results Compared with the control group,the RBC,PLT,HCT,WBC and HB of subjects in the observation group were more accurate(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in MCHC,MCH and MCV between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with the peripheral blood sampling method,the venous blood sampling method has better blood circulation and more stable composition,which helps to ensure the accuracy of the final test results and provide more useful information for the doctor to diagnose the disease.

关 键 词：静脉血 末梢血 血常规 价值分析 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]