存在非期望产出的城市紧凑式发展效率测度与比较研究  

Efficiency and Comparative Analysis of Compact Development in Cities with Undesirable Output

作　　者：吴冠岑[1] 杨浩 崇丹 WU Guancen;YANG Hao;CHONG Dan(School of Management,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China)

机构地区：[1]上海大学管理学院,上海200444

出　　处：《中国软科学》2021年第2期79-89,共11页China Soft Science

基　　金：上海市哲学社会科学规划项目“前景理论视角下年轻人住房支付能力对居住选择的影响及政策响应”(2019BCK002);上海市人民政府发展研究中心战略研究课题“上海城市土地空间资源潜力、再开发及城市更新研究”(2014-A-28-A);国家社科基金重大项目“特大城市社会风险系统治理研究”(16ZDA083)。

摘　　要：紧凑式的发展对城市经济、社会和环境方面具有多种不同的正面和负面效应,效率评判则是衡量城市紧凑式发展效果好坏的重要方式。研究运用存在非期望产出的SBM模型以及Malmquist指数对我国59个大城市紧凑式发展效率进行测度发现,研究期间内各城市紧凑式发展的整体效率为0.768,虽未达到有效状态,但显现出逐步上升的趋势。其中超大城市的效率最高,特大城市效率最低。效率提升的主要原因是技术进步,更为配套的政策,合理的资源配置,非期望产出的减少也有利于提高城市紧凑式发展的效率和可持续性。Compact development has different positive and negative effects on urban economy, society and environment. Efficiency evaluation is precisely an important way to measure the effect of compact urban development. The SBM model with undesirable output and Malmquist index are used to measure the compact development efficiency of 59 cities in China. It is found that the efficiency of compact development of each city during the study period is 0.768, and there is a gradual upward trend. The efficiency of Super-Mega-city is the highest, and that of Mega-cities is the lowest. The main reason for the improvement of efficiency is technological progress. More matching policies, reasonable resource allocation and the reduction of undesirable output are more conducive to improving the efficiency and sustainability of the urban compact development.

关 键 词：紧凑城市 效率 非期望产出SBM模型 MALMQUIST指数 

分 类 号：F293[经济管理—国民经济]