检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石秀云 陈红松 刘成丰 祁雨佳 SHI Xiu-yun;CHEN Hong-song;LIU Cheng-feng;QI Yu-jia(Qinghai Geermu Meteorological Bureau,Geermu Qinghai 816099,China)
机构地区:[1]青海省格尔木市气象局,青海格尔木816099
出 处:《青海农林科技》2021年第1期77-83,88,共8页Science and Technology of Qinghai Agriculture and Forestry
摘 要:基于高空实况和数值模式资料,对2020年5月5-6日期间发生在青海省的一次降水天气过程就降水实况、各模式降水落区、降水及温度预报偏差等方面进行了分析,结果表明:EC模式预报相对稳定,GRAPES-GFS与实况更靠近,NCEP模式预报仍然偏弱。对于降水落区预报来说GRAPES-GFS的24h预报降水落区和降水量级更准确,对于降水和最高、最低气温预报准确率,整体来看GRAPES3km准确率最高,其次是GRAPES-GFS,再次是EC-thin,NCEP准确率最低。Based on the actual data of upper air and numerical model data,the precipitation weather process in Qinghai during May 5-6 of 2020 is analyzed in terms of the actual precipitation,precipitation area of each model,precipitation and temperature forecast deviation.The results showed that EC model forecast is relatively stable,EGGF-GFS is closer to the actual situation,and NCEP model forecast is still weak.For the forecast of precipitation falling area,the 24-hour GRAPES-GFS forecast of precipitation falling area and precipitation level is more accurate.For the forecast accuracy of precipitation,maximum and minimum temperature,the GRAPES3km has the highest accuracy on the whole,followed by GRAPES-GFS,then EC-thin,NCEP has the lowest accuracy.
分 类 号:P456.7[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.68.255