马克思语言哲学与西方语言哲学的对比研究——兼论体认语言学  

On the contrast between Marxist philosophy of language and Western philosophy of language:With discussion of embodied-cognitive linguistics

作　　者：王寅[1] Wang Yin

机构地区：[1]四川外国语大学语言哲学研究中心,重庆400031

出　　处：《西安外国语大学学报》2021年第1期1-6,共6页Journal of Xi’an International Studies University

基　　金：2013年国家社会科学基金项目“语言哲学研究”(项目编号:13FYY009)的研究成果之一。

摘　　要：笔者曾试析了马克思语言哲学(马语哲)与西方主流语言哲学(西语哲)之间的关联及其异同,发现其间的最大差别在于是否坚守语言的“社会性”和“实践性”立场,前者尤为强调语言的这一本质特征,而后者却抛弃了它,包括索绪尔和乔姆斯基。本文沿此思路继续从“政治性与系统性、历时性与共时性、斗争性与合作性、人本性与客观性、施为性与表述性、劳动性与符号性、物质性与心智性”等七个方面展开论述。体认语言学接受了马语哲的核心观点,用“体”强调了语言的社会性和实践性等,用“认”突显了语言的人本性等。The author-has attempted to analyze the association and similarities-differences between Marxist Philosophy of Language(MPL)and Western Philosophy of Language(WPL),only to find that the former adheres in linguistic sociality and practicality while the latter rejects them(including Saussure and Chomsky),which is the most important distinction about language nature.The present paper,in line with this thought,continues our discussion from the following seven aspects:politicality vs systematicality,synchronicity vs diachronicity,struggle vs cooperation,humanity vs objectivity,performativity vs constativity,labour vs symbol,materiality vs mentality.Embodied-cognitive linguistics has accepted the kernel ideas of MPL,witht"ti"(body or embodiment)for the emphasis on linguistic sociality and praticality etc.,with"ren"(cognition)on linguistic humanism etc..

关 键 词：马语哲 西语哲 社会性 实践性 体认语言学 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]