私人主体受公法约束的裁判模式  

The Adjudicating Approach of Deciding Whether a Private Party Should Be Bound by Public Law

作　　者：李蕊佚[1] Li Ruiyi(School of Law,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350)

机构地区：[1]南开大学法学院,天津300350

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2021年第4期59-67,157,共10页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：天津市社科规划项目“公私合作的公法责任承担机制研究”(ZX20160087)的阶段性成果;中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(63192254)。

摘　　要：从单方高权走向公私合作是现代公共治理变革的标志之一。为了在公私合作中更加有效、全面地保障基本权利,很多学者主张私人主体应当受公法约束。然而,即使建构了可以追究私人主体公法责任的制度,还有一个更为棘手的问题:在具体案件中如何区分“公”、“私”,如何将公法的适用仅限定于含有公法因素的法律问题上?本文通过研究英国《人权法》第6条引入的“混合行政机关”这一概念,试图从“行为”而非“组织”的视角判断私人主体是否受公法约束,即行为是否具有公共性质是判断私人主体是否受公法约束的依据。Public-private-partnership is one of the reforms on public governance contemporarily.To more effectively and more comprehensively protect fundamental rights,it is argued that private sectors should be bound by the public law under some conditions.However,even if the system were established under which the private sectors can be regulated by the public law,there is a tricky question:how to distinguish the public function and private behavior,namely how to apply the public law only into those public law cases?Based on the legislative experience of the UK,this paper introduces a new concept“Hybrid Public Authority”into our legal system,and proposes to decide whether a private party should be regulated by public law from the view of its behavior.

关 键 词：双重标准 混合公权力机关 公法义务 公私合作 

分 类 号：D956.1[政治法律—法学] DD912.7