检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李双霞 向准 LI Shuang-xia;XIANG Zhun(College of Law and Public Administration,Jishou University,Jishou Hunan 416000,China)
机构地区:[1]吉首大学法学与公共管理学院,湖南吉首416000
出 处:《华北理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第2期15-20,51,共7页Journal of North China University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基 金:2018年吉首大学人文社科项目(刑罚目的论视域下贪污犯罪的刑法规制研究)[18SKB07]成果。
摘 要:近年来社会上一些典型刑事案例的出现,引发诸多舆论争议。民众发挥舆论监督功效的同时,以道德化视角审视案件与专业化、权威化的司法运作机制产生冲突和矛盾。结合刑事案例对舆论监督和司法审判间的关系进行梳理,从价值和制度设计上发现二者间的同一性和斗争性,分析舆论监督对司法审判的积极影响和负面影响,同时为舆论监督和司法审判的良性互动提供建议。既发挥舆论的监督效能,又为司法独立和司法公正保有余地,达到二者间的平衡,守住社会公平正义的最后防线。In recent years, the emergence of some typical criminal cases in society has caused extensive public opinion. While the public exerts the effect of public opinion supervision, examining cases from a moral perspective will also produce conflicts and contradictions with the specialized and authoritative judicial operation mechanism. Based on the criminal cases in recent years, this paper combs the relationship between public opinion supervision and judicial trial, finds out the identity and fighting between them from the value and system design, and analyzes the positive and negative effects of public opinion supervision on judicial trial. At the same time, this paper provides suggestions for the benign interaction between public opinion supervision and judicial trial. It not only exerts the supervision efficiency of public opinion, but also maintains the leeway for judicial independence and judicial justice, achieves the balance between them, and maintains the last line of defense of social fairness and justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31