长三角地区卫生资源集聚度评价分析  

Evaluation on Health Resources Allocation in the Yangtze River Delta Based on Agglomeration Degree

作　　者：陈秀芝 彭颖[1] 康琦[1] 张晓溪[1] 王瑾[1] 徐崇勇 王卉晓 申屠正荣 金春林[1] CHEN Xiu-zhi;PENG Ying;KANG Qi(Shanghai Health Development Research Center(Shanghai Medical Information Center),Shanghai,200040,China;不详)

机构地区：[1]上海市卫生和健康发展研究中心卫生政策研究部上海市医学科学技术情报研究所,上海200040 [2]上海市卫生健康委员会规划发展研究处,上海200125 [3]安徽省卫生健康委员会,合肥230022 [4]浙江省卫生健康委员会,杭州310006

出　　处：《中国卫生经济》2021年第3期37-39,共3页Chinese Health Economics

基　　金：上海市哲学社会科学规划课题(2019BGL030);上海市卫生健康委员会卫生健康政策课题(2020HP02)。

摘　　要：目的:分析比较长三角各省市、长三角与京津冀区域卫生资源配置的公平性。方法:运用集聚度法,从地理、人口和经济维度对2019年数据进行计算并比较。结果:安徽省卫生资源集聚度和比值均小于1;长三角床位和护士配置的公平性优于京津冀;上海卫生资源配置的集聚度高于北京,但可及性低于北京。结论:长三角及上海新城卫生资源优化布局应着重考虑人口因素;长三角应补齐卫生资源短板并加快要素流动;人口流动强度应纳入卫生资源配置公平性评价。Objective:To analyze and compare the agglomeration degree of health resources of the Yangtze River Delta and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region.Methods:The Health Resource Agglomeration Degree(HRAD)method and the comparative analysis are conducted on data of 2019 among different geographic regions,populations and the Gross Domestic Product(GDP).Results:HRADs/PADs of Anhui Province are below 1.By contrast,the HRADs/PADs of beds and nurses in the Yangtze River Delta are better than those of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region.Nationally,the HRADs of Shanghai are better than those of Beijing,but the HRADs/PADs are lower than those of Beijing.Conclusion:The optimal distribution of health resources in the Yangtze River Delta and Shanghai New City should focus on population.Filling shortcomings and promoting inter-regional free movement of factors of health resources should be considered.Population Flow Intensity(PFI)should also be included in the evaluation.

关 键 词：长三角地区 卫生资源配置 卫生资源集聚度 公平性评价 

分 类 号：R1-9[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学] F241[经济管理—劳动经济]