农产品成本调查国际比较及经验借鉴——对美国、加拿大、澳大利亚和英国及欧盟经验的梳理与分析  

International Comparison and Experience Reference of Agricultural Product Cost Investigation——Based on the analysis of the experience of the United States, Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom and the European Union

作　　者：王庆[1] 

机构地区：[1]国家发展和改革委员会价格成本调查中心

出　　处：《价格理论与实践》2020年第9期26-28,共3页Price:Theory & Practice

摘　　要：近年来,随着我国新型农业生产经营和服务主体快速增长,新产业、新业态竞相涌现,数字技术与农业农村加速融合,传统的农产品成本调查面临新挑战,需要深入了解并借鉴国际先进经验,完善与现代农业产业体系、生产体系、经营体系相适应的农产品成本调查工作机制。本文以美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、英国及欧盟为代表,从农产品成本调查主体、调查方法、调查指标、信息发布等方面进行梳理,并展开比较,就完善我国农产品成本调查制度体系、改进农产品成本调查工作方式、加强农产品成本数据管理与开发等方面提出相关政策建议。In recent years, with the rapid growth of new agricultural production and operation and service entities in China, new industries and new formats have emerged, and the integration of digital technology and agriculture and rural areas has accelerated, and digital technology has accelerated the integration of agricultural and rural areas. Traditional agricultural product cost surveys are now facing new challenges. It is necessary to understand and learn from the advanced international experience,and improve the agricultural product cost investigation working mechanism that is compatible with the modern agricultural industry system, production system, and management system. This article takes the United States, Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the European Union as representatives, sorts out and compares the subjects, methods, indicators, and information releases of agricultural production costs. Relevant policy suggestions are put forward on the improvement of the agricultural product cost investigation system in China and the agricultural product cost investigation work methods, and the strengthening of the management and development of agricultural product cost data.

关 键 词：农产品成本调查 农产品成本数据管理 农产品成本信息 

分 类 号：F302.6[经济管理—产业经济] F323F125