外求还是内倾:论当下“新诗标准”两种诉求取向的诗学可能  

External Appeal or Internal Appeal: On the Poetic Possibility of the Two Orientations of the Current “New Poetry Standard”

作　　者：杨金彪 Yang Jinbiao(College of literature,Yancheng Teachers University,Yancheng,China)

机构地区：[1]盐城师范学院文学院,江苏盐城224001

出　　处：《社会科学论坛》2021年第2期198-218,共21页Tribune of Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目《诗学问题:新诗批评研究(2000-2017)》阶段性成果,项目编号:18FZW029。

摘　　要：新世纪以来"新诗标准"讨论中涌现的诸多"提案"就其诗学逻辑与倾向而言可以归纳为两种类型:外求型标准与内倾型标准。前者将其诗学有效性挂靠在客观性上,以外在认同为最终追求,其关键词是难度、技术等具有客观性的概念。后者将诗学有效性放置于主观性,以自我追问为其终极皈依,更强调诗的悟性与偶然。前者对后者处于话语"碾压"态势,二者的"结合"尚无恰切诗学机缘。再次引入"主体性"理论视野,结合中国传统心性之学,确立"诗心"作为新诗标准的主体,以"共通感"作为新诗标准的诗学普遍性与有效性的理论表述,庶几能"化解"新诗标准提案的诸多虚妄而重获诗歌本体认识的正本清源。In terms of poetic logic and tendency, the proposals which have emerged in the discussion of the "new poetry standard" since the new century can be classified into two types: the external-oriented standard and the internal-oriented standard. The former attaches its poetic validity to objectivity, regarding external identity as its ultimate pursuit, and its key words are the concepts with objectivity such as difficulty and technique. The latter puts the validity of poetics on subjectivity, taking self-examination as its ultimate goal, and emphasizes the comprehension and the contingency of poetry. The state is that the former is "crushing" the latter, and the "combination" of the two standards lacks suitable poetic chance. Introducing the theory of "subjectivity" as perspective of poetics, combining with the Chinese traditional mind study, establishing "poetic mind" as the subject of the standard of new poetry, and taking "common sense" as the theoretical expression of universality and validity of the standard of new poetry, maybe can "dispel" a lot of false proposals of new poetry standard and regain the original source of poetic understanding.

关 键 词：新诗标准 视差之见 主体性 心的回归 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]