检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任超 REN Chao(School of Urban Economics and Management,Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Beijing 102616,China)
机构地区:[1]北京建筑大学城市经济与管理学院,北京102616
出 处:《河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2021年第1期142-151,共10页Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基 金:中国法学会2018年度部级法学研究课题“宗教建筑遗产保护法律制度研究”(CLS(2018)D67);北京市教育委员会社科一般项目专项资金资助(SM201810016002)。
摘 要:德国在文化遗产领域已经形成了以成文立法为主,司法判例为辅的规范保护体系。其中的成文规范在具体运行过程中取得了良好的法律效果,但是在制度层面也存在着结构性瑕疵和内容性缺失的不足。相关的司法判例群在现实中也发挥着关键性作用,不仅可以对法律条文进行补充解释,而且还承担了规范续造和内容创新的任务。德国文化遗产的法律保护始终遵循着一定的逻辑线索而向前运动,并且呈现出国际化、欧洲化以及去国家化的内在变化走向。在借鉴德国相关经验成果的基础上,中国《文物保护法》应当在立法理念、立法模式、形式结构以及制度内容等方面予以修订完善。In the field of cultural heritage,Germany has formed a normative protection system based on written legislation and supplemented by judicial precedents.The written legislation has achieved good legal effects in operation process,but there are also structural flaws and deficiency of content at institutional level.The related judicial precedent groups also play a key role in reality.It can not only supplement the interpretation of legal provisions,but also undertake the task of continuous creation and content innovation.The legal protection of German cultural heritage always follows certain logical clues to move forward,and presents the internal change trend of internationalization,Europeanization and denationalization.On the basis of German relevant experience and achievements,Heritage Protection Law in our country should be revised and improved in terms of legislative concepts,legislative models,formal structures,and institutional contents.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7