《刑法修正案(十一)》中竞合条款的理解与适用  

Understanding and Application of Clauses on Concurrencein Amendment (Ⅺ) to Criminal Law

作　　者：王彦强[1] Wang Yanqiang

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《政治与法律》2021年第4期95-108,共14页Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“竞合理论的体系构建和适用问题研究”(项目编号:20BFX116)的阶段性成果;江苏紫金文化优青人才项目资助

摘　　要：随着刑事立法的日趋活跃,采“分则立法模式”的竞合条款日益呈现“立法肥大症”,可考虑将竞合条款(尤其是想象竞合从一重处断条款)进行总则化改造。就新增竞合条款的理解与适用而言,作为想象竞合表征的从一重处断条款,其适用关键是“一行为”与“数法益”的判断;新修正的我国《刑法》第229条第2款,标志着立法者对牵连犯现象的进一步肯认,其适用以客观上存在牵连关系、主观上具备牵连意图为限;新增的数罪并罚条款(第280条之二第3款),则存在修正程序与实体内容两方面的瑕疵,应将其视为想象竞合数罪并罚的“拟制规定”加以适用。With the increasing activity of criminal legislation,the clauses on concurrence in the legislative mode of specific provisions are increasingly showing the symptom of"legislative hypertrophy",thus it is time to consider the incorporation of such clauses(especially causes on convicting the accused of the heavier crime in case of imaginative concurrence)into the general provisions of Criminal Law.The newly-added clauses on convicting the accused of the heavier crime are mostly concerning imaginative concurrence,and the key to their application is the judgment of"one act"and"several legal interests"in a case of imaginative concurrence.The newly amended Paragraph 2 of Article 229,is a signal of the legislature's confirmation of the doctrine of implicated offenses,its application is limited to situations where there are implicated relation in objective term and implicated intention in objective term.The newly added clause of"combined punishment for several crimes"(Paragraph 3 of Article 280 B)has defects in both legislative procedure and substantive content,which should be regarded and applied as a"special provision"of combined punishment for a case with imaginative concurrence.

关 键 词：刑法修正案(十一) 竞合条款 立法模式 司法适用 

分 类 号：DF611[政治法律—刑法学]