透明性同行评议:产生、内涵与建构  

Transparent peer review:Origin,connotation,and construction

作　　者：贺颖[1] 付江阳 HE Ying;FU Jiangyang(School of Management,Tianjin Normal University,393 Binshui Road,Xiqing District,Tianjin 300387,China)

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学管理学院,天津市300387

出　　处：《中国科技期刊研究》2021年第3期332-336,共5页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“基于区块链的科学论文开放式同行评议质量控制研究”(20BTQ084)。

摘　　要：【目的】引入透明性同行评议这一新兴概念,对其边界进行界定,并建构相应的发展框架,提出实践对策。【方法】使用案例分析和文献搜集的方法,总结透明性同行评议的特点、现状以及存在的问题,并在此基础上提出透明性同行评议的构建框架。【结果】透明性同行评议解决了开放式同行评议中存在的基本问题,即作者发表论文的需求和评议专家保护隐私的需要,因此,透明性同行评议是理想与现实的结合,更具实践优势。【结论】透明性同行评议涉及作者、评议专家、编辑、读者,以及科研机构评价体系等主体。在透明性同行评议的探索过程中,应该继续坚持多元合作的原则,将同行评议的改良工作扩展到更多的主体当中。[Purposes]The aim of this paper is to introduce transparent peer review,elucidate its connotation,develop a corresponding theoretical framework,and put forward suggestions for its implementation.[Methods]With the methods of case study and literature research,we summarized the characteristics,status quo,and problems of transparent peer review,and thereby developed a theoretical framework for it.[Findings]Transparent peer reviewsolved the basic problem in open peer review:the conflict between the need of publishing papers from authors and privacy protection requirement of reviewers.Therefore,with solid theoretical framework and consideration of practical needs,transparent peer reviewwas more advantageous in practice.[Conclusions]Transparent peer reviewinvolves authors,reviewers,editors,readers,evaluation systems of research institutions,etc.It should uphold the principle of manifold cooperation,so that more subjects can participate in the improvement of peer review.

关 键 词：同行评议 开放同行评议 透明性同行评议 开放科学 科学评价 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]