论我国个人破产免责制度的建构  

On the Construction of the Personal Bankruptcy Discharge in China

作　　者：顾芳芳[1] GU Fangfang(College of Humanities and Social Sciences,Nanjing University of Aeronautics&Astronautics,Nan-jing,Jiangsu 211106,China)

机构地区：[1]南京航空航天大学人文与社会科学学院,江苏南京211106

出　　处：《南京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第1期65-71,共7页Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics（Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(16FFX027)。

摘　　要：在个人破产中,免责是最大的诱因。免责制度的设计和个人破产的立法指导思想休戚相关,我国建立个人破产制度,首要的是在理论上认可免责的正当性。个人破产的结构安排则决定了免责的模式,双轨制的立法体例分别对应着直接免责和附条件免责的模式。直接免责和附条件免责所对应的免责范围不同,哪种类型的债务可以被免责要和一国的国情和民众的心理相适应。债务人已经获得的免责会因欺诈而被撤销,免责环节要防范债务人滥用的道德风险。In personal bankruptcy system,discharge is the most important incentive.The design of the discharge system is closely related to the legislative guiding ideology of personal bankruptcy.The first thing in China to create a personal bankruptcy system is to recognize the legitimacy of discharge in theory.The modes of discharge are determined by the structural arrangement of personal bankruptcy.The dual-track legislative style corresponds to the mode of direct discharge and conditional discharge respectively.The scope of discharge under the two different models is also different.The type of debt that can be discharged must be adapted to the national conditions of our country and the psychology of our people.The discharge the debtor has obtained will be revoked due to fraud,and we must avoid the moral hazard by debtor’s abuse.

关 键 词：个人破产 免责的正当性 免责模式 免责范围 

分 类 号：D922.29.92[政治法律—经济法学]