正义的规范何以可能?——论马克思主义法哲学构建的施塔姆勒视角  

How can Norm be Just:On the Construction of Marxist Legal Philosophy from Stammler's View

作　　者：王时中[1] 苑诗野 WANG Shi-zhong;YUAN Shi-ye(Faculty of Philosophy,Nankai University,Tianjian 300350,China)

机构地区：[1]南开大学哲学院,天津300350

出　　处：《贵州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第2期1-7,共7页Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学项目“20世纪以来康德主义与马克思主义之间的互动关系研究”(18YJA720014);天津市研究生科研创新项目“马克思主义法哲学与自然法理论关系研究”(2020YJSB171)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：“规范”何以进入“科学”的问题是近代以来西方法哲学理论的核心问题。自然法学派与法律实证主义者围绕规范的科学性论题展开了激烈的交锋,推动着法哲学理论的发展。施塔姆勒接续了康德的先验理性框架,在两个流派的对峙之中建构了“正义法理论”,将正义法理论建立在科学的基础之上。一方面,他批判了理性形而上学,回答了“正义法何以是科学”的问题;另一方面,他批判了自然科学在社会领域的推广,回应了“正义法何以是社会科学”的问题。施塔姆勒对正义法理论的构造路径,为马克思主义法哲学的研究提供了不可或缺的镜鉴,并将大大推进现代政治哲学对规范问题的深入思考。The question of“How can norms be into science?”is the core issue of western legal philosophy since modern times.The school of natural law and the legal positivists fought fiercely around the topics such as scientific nature of norms,which has promoted the development of legal philosophy.Stammler continued Kant’s rationalist tradition and constructed the“The Theory of Justice Law”,aiming to establish“The Theory of Justice Law”on the basis of science.On the one hand,he criticized the metaphysics of reason and answered the question of“Why the law of justice is a science?”.On the other hand,he criticized the social promotion of natural science and responded to the question of“Why the law of justice is a social science?”.Stammler’s approach provides an indispensable mirror for the study of Marxist philosophy of law and inspires modern political philosophy to conduct in-depth thinking on the topic of norms.

关 键 词：正义法 施塔姆勒 先验理性 社会科学 

分 类 号：B0-0[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]