检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石庆环[1] 李俊霖 SHI Qing-huan;LI Jun-lin
机构地区:[1]辽宁大学历史学院,沈阳110036 [2]辽宁大学,沈阳110036
出 处:《求是学刊》2021年第1期158-168,共11页Seeking Truth
基 金:辽宁省教育厅项目“美国地方政府公务员管理制度研究”(LJC202016);韩国财团辽宁大学亚洲研究中心项目“美国政府腐败治理经验对中国政府廉政建设理论借鉴意义研究”(Y201909)。
摘 要:立法机制改革,是二战后美国国会以提升自身立法能力的方式来制衡联邦行政权扩张的积极尝试。通过分析改革成效可知,既有的改革措施确实对提升美国国会立法能力和维护其在联邦政策制定过程中的话语权起到了积极作用,但由于这些措施均不同程度地陷入了围绕国会立法权行使方式展开的权力博弈,改革的实际成效始终未达到预期。如果美国国会仍试图继续其立法机制改革,则必须要找到既能有效提升立法能力,又能远离国会内部"权力游戏"的新路径。The legislative system reform is an active attempt by the Congress to improve its legislative ability to check the expansion of the federal executive power after the World War Ⅱ. Through the analysis of the results of the reform, the existing reform measures have promoted the legislation capacity of the U.S. Congress,and played an active role in maintaining the power of congress in the federal policy making process. However,the actual results of these reforms have not been as effective as expected because they have all been caught up in the power games over the way Congress exercises its legislative power. If the U.S. Congress still tries to continue its legislative system reform, it must find new ways to effectively enhance its legislative capacity while staying out of the "power games" within Congress.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229