检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李萌 王恩龙[2] LI Meng;WANG Enlong(Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Liaoning Shenyang 110000,China;Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Liaoning Shenyang 110000,China)
机构地区:[1]辽宁中医药大学,辽宁沈阳110000 [2]辽宁中医药大学附属医院,辽宁沈阳110000
出 处:《中医药临床杂志》2021年第2期268-274,共7页Clinical Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:系统评价电针治疗脑卒中后痉挛性瘫痪的临床疗效。方法:检索中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、中国学术期刊数据库(万方数据)、中文科技期刊数据库(重庆维普)、中国生物医学文献服务系统SinoMed、PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science数据库建库至2020年3月关于电针治疗脑卒中后痉挛性瘫痪的中、英文文献。2名研究员对检出文献进行整理,依据Cochrane协作网偏倚风险评价工具进行偏倚风险评估,选用RevMan5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:最终纳入11篇文献,共879例患者。Meta分析结果提示,有效率评定电针组疗效优于对照组RR=1.27,95%CI[1.16,1.40];改良的Ashworth量表(MAS)评定电针组疗效优于对照组MD=-0.36,95%CI[-0.57,-0.16];简式Fugl-Meyer评分法(FMA)评定电针组疗效优于对照组MD=10.55,95%CI[8.76,12.34];改良Barthel指数(MBI)评定电针组疗效优于对照组MD=6.85,95%CI[5.16,8.53];神经功能缺损程度评分(NDS)评定电针组疗效优于对照组MD=-2.61,95%CI[-3.01,-2.20];临床痉挛指数(CSI)评定电针组优于对照组MD=-1.11,95%CI[-1.60,-0.62],差异均具有统计学意义。结论:电针对于脑卒中后痉挛性瘫痪有一定疗效,鉴于纳入的文献数量较少、质量较低,仍需更多高质量的研究,为临床循证提供依据。Objective:To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture in the treatment of spastic paralysis after stroke.Methods:Search the Chinese Journal Full-text Database (CNKI),China Academic Journal Database (Wanfang Data),Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (Chongqing Weipu),China Biomedical Literature Service System SinoMed,PubMed,Cochrane Library,Web of Science database to Chinese and English literature on electroacupuncture treatment of spastic paralysis after stroke in March 2020.Two researchers sorted out the detected literature,assessed the risk of bias based on the Cochrane Collaboration bias risk assessment tool,and selected RevMan5.3 software for meta-analysis.Results:11 articles were finally included,with a total of 879 patients.Meta analysis results indicate that the effective rate of the electroacupuncture group is better than the control group,RR=1.27,95%CI[1.16,1.40];the modified Ashworth scale (MAS) is better than the control group for the curative effect MD=-0.36,95% CI[-0.57,-0.16];the simple Fugl-Meyer scoring method (FMA) evaluates that the electroacupuncture group is better than the control group MD=10.55,95% CI[8.76,12.34];modified Barthel index (MBI) The curative effect of the electroacupuncture group is better than the control group MD=6.85,95%CI[5.16,8.53];the neurological deficit score (NDS) is better than the control group MD=-2.61,95%CI[-3.01,-2.20];The clinical spasticity index (CSI) assessment of the electroacupuncture group is better than the control group MD=-1.11,95%CI[-1.60,-0.62],the difference is statistically significant.Conclusion:Electroacupuncture has a certain effect on spastic paralysis after stroke.In view of the small number and low quality of the included literature,more high-quality studies are still needed to provide evidence for clinical evidence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15