Institutional Degeneration of Science  

作　　者：Juri Eintalu 

机构地区：[1]A freelance translator of philosophy,Tallinn,Estonia

出　　处：《Journal of Philosophy Study》2021年第2期116-123,共8页哲学研究（英文版）

摘　　要：The scientificity of the research should be evaluated according to the methodology used in the study.However,these are usually the research areas or the institutions that are classified as scientific or non-scientific.Because of various reasons,it may turn out that the scientific institutions are not producing science,while the“non-scientists”are doing real science.In the extreme case,the official science system is entirely corrupt,consisting of fraudsters,while the real scientists have been expelled from academic institutions.Since 2016-2017,there has been much talk about the“post-truth era”and the politicians who are“denying science”.However,simultaneously,many complaints about the corruption of science appeared.The outsider cannot tell who is telling the truth as it may be the case that the science fraudsters are defending themselves and these politicians are aware of the corruption.It is also untrue that the censoring or suppression of science started from 2016-2017.Suppression of science because of political and ideological reasons was present already long ago,and during the last few years,it has been increasing.The picture is highly complicated as there are many pretenders,false accusations,etc.For example,because of political reasons,someone may be set up as a pseudoscientist,the real scientist may be expelled using political accusations,justified criticism may be labelled as political pressure,etc.There is something like an inner information war ongoing in and around science.The classical philosophy of science seems unable to handle it because every formal rule can be misapplied.Science,as a whole,may be unable to persist.

关 键 词：CENSORSHIP degeneration of science science fraud philosophy of science post-truth PSEUDOSCIENCE SCIENCE 

分 类 号：G32[文化科学]